|
About
JRN21 |
|
The ICSJR |
|
The
Philippine Supreme Court
crafted in 2000 its own
Action Program for Judicial
Reforms (APJR) and has,
since then, vigorously
implemented various projects
aimed at enhancing judicial
institutions and improving
the delivery of judicial
services.
Similarly, countries in the
Asia Pacific and elsewhere
have also launched their
judicial reform initiatives
to address basic issues,
such as judicial
independence, fiscal
autonomy, judicial
efficiency and
effectiveness, and access to
justice, among others.
Despite these rich and
numerous country-led
efforts, there is no
regional institutional forum
for the exchange of ideas
and experiences on judicial
reforms. Hence, the Supreme
Court of the Philippines is
initiating the organization
of a network that will
facilitate knowledge-sharing
and knowledge-management
mechanisms among the
Justices, judges, and legal
practitioners in the
Asia-Pacific Region. Towards
this end, an International
Conference and Showcase on
Judicial Reforms will be
held on 28-30 November 2005
at Makati Shangri-La Hotel,
Philippines.
The theme of the Conference
is “Strengthening the
Judiciaries of the 21st
Century” and shall consist
of two (2) parts: (a)
Plenary and Parallel
Sessions that will
facilitate sharing of ideas,
experiences, best practices,
and reform initiatives that
will address such issues as
judicial independence,
integrity, transparency,
accountability, efficiency,
and access to justice
through platform addresses,
open fora and break-out
group sessions; and (b)
Showcase of judicial reform
projects through exhibit
booths by invited countries.
All Plenary and Parallel
Sessions shall have the
following themes:
1st day : Judicial
Independence,
Accountability, Integrity
and Competence
2nd day : Access to Justice
3rd day : Judicial Reform
Management, Implementation
and Knowledge Sharing
Objectives:
• Facilitate sharing of
ideas, experiences, best
practices and reform
initiatives that address
issues on judicial
independence, integrity,
transparency,
accountability, efficiency
and access to justice;
• Identify areas of
collaboration among Asia
Pacific justices, judges and
legal institutions to
promote judicial and legal
reforms; and
• Institutionalize a
knowledge-sharing and
knowledge management
mechanism through the
organization of an Asia
Pacific Judicial Reform (APJR)
Network.
Expected Outputs:
• Presentation and
discussion of ideas,
experiences, best practices,
and reform initiatives;
• Showcase of judicial
reform projects on judicial
independence, integrity,
transparency,
accountability, efficiency
and access to justice;
• Consensus on areas of
collaboration; and
• Organization of the Asia
Pacific Judicial Reform (APJR)
Network.
Participants:
• Chief Justices and heads
of their respective judicial
reform programs of selected
countries of the Asia
Pacific Region;
• Members of the Asia
Pacific Judicial Educators
Forum (APJEF)
• Development Partners and
oversight agencies.
|
|
|
The Manila Declaration for a
21st Century Independent
Judiciary
Principles: We re-affirm
the core judicial
independence and
accountability principles
enshrined in the universal
declaration of human rights,
the United Nations Basic
Principles on the
Independence of the
Judiciary, the International
Covenant on Civil and
Political Rights and the
Beijing Declaration on
Independence of the
Judiciary, and recommit
ourselves to their speedy
and effective
implementation.
Demands on the Judiciary:
The demands on the
judiciary have grown
exponentially in recent
years. Country, regional and
global economic, political
and technological trends
also demand a 21st century
civilization grounded on the
rule of law and access to
justice for all citizens. We
recognize the need for
judiciaries in the
Asia-Pacific Region to work
together more closely to
meet these common
challenges. We also
recognize that integrating
technology into the judicial
systems can facilitate
knowledge sharing and
learning, management of
dockets, prompt disposition
of cases, and better access
to courts by all citizens.
Priority: Towards
this end, the Chief Justices
and participants of this
Conference were in unanimous
agreement to establish a
judicial knowledge and
technique sharing network (APJR
Network) for all of the
Supreme Courts and the
judicial community in the
Asia-Pacific Region. Unlike
any other time in our
region's history, almost
every country is now
embarking in judicial
reform. There is much to
learn from one another about
what to do - and not do - on
judicial reform. This
necessarily calls for a
forum or network for
knowledge sharing of
judicial reform successes
and failures.
Objective: The main
objective of the APJR
Network is to share
knowledge, including lessons
learned, problems faced,
best practices and potential
model reform experiences
from the region as well as
globally.
Next steps: The
Philippine Supreme Court
believes in this important
mission and is willing to
serve as the Regional
Secretariat of the APJR
Network. The court, under
the leadership of Chief
Justice Davide, Jr., is very
pleased to have served as
the host for this
Conference, which is the
first collaborative step in
establishing the APJR
Network. Next steps will be
undertaken by the Chief
Justices of other
Asia-Pacific countries who
have also committed to this
mission and to hosting two
working group reform
roundtables over the next
year. These roundtables will
identify areas of high
priority collaboration among
Asia-Pacific Chief Justices,
judges and judicial
academies, with a view to
examining country
experiences that have
potential for replication or
adaptation in other
countries within the region.
Action: We all know
that our ability to access,
share, and profit from
specific judicial reform
experiences in different
countries will be vital to
our individual and
collective success.
For All: These
workshops, annual
conferences, on-going APJR
Electronic Dialogue, and the
united support of the donor
community, will enable us to
proceed with a 21st Century
Judicial Reform Agenda in a
concrete, prioritized, and
collaborative manner. We can
strive for no less for all
of our citizens as well as
for future generations.
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
|